JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 13, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Elena Reales Gutiérrez

✓Claimant Carlos Mario Isaza Serrano Vs. Fiscalia General De La Nacion

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Apertura De Un Incidente De Desacato De La Sentencia T-131 De 2005. En Razon De Su Improcedencia, Se Rechazo La Solicitud Del Actor.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez De Primera Instancia
  • Competente hasta que esté completamente restablecido el derecho o eliminadas las causas de la amenaza
  • Competente para conocer solicitudes de apertura de incidentes de desacato de sus órdenes y adoptar las medidas a que haya lugar
Incidente De Desacato
  • Competencia del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura en sentencia T-131/05
Accion De Tutela Contra Fiscalia General De La Nacion
  • Improcedencia incidente de desacato de la sentencia T-131/05
  • Solicitud apertura incidente de desacato de la sentencia T-131/05
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud del ciudadano Carlos Mario Isaza Serrano de abrir un incidente de desacato con ocasión de las órdenes impartidas en la Sentencia T-131 de 2005.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR al ciudadano Carlos Mario Isaza Serrano que el juez competente para conocer sobre las solicitudes de apertura del incidente de desacato de la sentencia T-131 de 2005 es la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cundinamarca.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.